Home » India » Lokpal Bill: Ramdev differs with Anna Hazare group over PM inclusion

Lokpal Bill: Ramdev differs with Anna Hazare group over PM inclusion

Posted by on June 1, 2011 0 Comment

The rift in civil society is out in the open with yoga guru Baba Ramdev differing with the Anna Hazare group over bringing the prime minister and higher judiciary under the ambit of the Lokpal, the proposed anti-corruption ombudsman.

Speaking at Sehore, 50 km from Bhopal, Ramdev seconded the position of the government that the PM and Chief Justice of India should be outside the ambit of the proposed Lokpal. “The post of PM and CJI are highly dignified and should not be under Lokpal. I don’t know how appropriate it would be for running democracy if unnecessary attacks are made on these offices.”

The yoga guru’s stand conflicted with the position taken by the Hazare group who had on Monday locked horns with the government over their demand to keep the PM within the jurisdiction of the Lokpal Bill, and can provide respite to UPA managers who had a torrid time dealing with civil society’s agitation against corruption.

Significantly, soon after Ramdev’s statement echoing government’s stand, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh publicly appealed to the yoga guru to give up his threatened fast to death from June 4 to bring black money stashed in foreign havens back to India. He promised swift and practical measures to bring offenders to book.

The PM’s appeal was the latest of a number of measures taken by the government to appease the yoga guru who had not long ago been attacked by Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh. The government has sent the CBDT chairman to hold talks with Ramdev, dubbed a spiritual entrepreneur by some and suspected to be a closet saffronite by others, on his demand to ban currency notes of higher denomination. There are also indications that finance minister Pranab Mukherjee may talk to him on this and demand for measures to bring black money back from abroad.

The outreach to Ramdev comes when Anna Hazare group has threatened to walk out of the joint drafting committee on Lokpal, accusing the government of diluting its intent to have a bill passed in the monsoon session of Parliament expected to begin in the third week of July.

While senior ministers P Chidambaram and Kapil Sibal denied the government was trying to wriggle out of its commitments, they did suggest the Hazare group’s position on inclusion of the PM, judiciary and actions of MPs in Parliament needed more debate and wider consensus.

With the group pressing for the Central Vigilance Commission and Central Bureau of Investigation to be also subservient to the Lokpal, government indicated that such a “super body” was unlikely to pass muster with the political class. Any bill will have to go through Parliament, government warned.

Faced with questions from reporters whether a split in civil society ranks helped its cause, home minister P Chidambaram dismissed suggestions that such a divide was being engineered as an uncharitable remark. “I think this is the most unkind comment and the least I can say is that it is very, very uncharitable,” he said. He added that former chief justices like Justices J S Verma and M N Venkatachaliah also were of the view that higher judiciary should not be included in the proposed legislation.

But the home minister did stress on divergence in views among civil society members. On more than one occasion, Chidambaram said there was no unanimity on the contentious issues between “civil society, intellectuals, authors” and others as well. All this meant the Hazare group may not have the last word on the bill.

In case Congress wishes to drive a wedge in the civil society camp, it may be helped by rivalry between Ramdev and supporters of Hazare. The Hazare campaign has tried to keep a distance from Ramdev largely because of the suspicion of his pro-RSS inclinations. For his part, the yoga guru had some time ago called Hazare as a leader of Maharashtra, suggesting his own all-India appeal. He also criticized the nomination of father-son lawyer duo of Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan as an instance of nepotism. Economic Times

No comments yet... Be the first to leave a reply!

Leave a Reply